MakerKit vs Achromatica newer low-priced kit vs public releases since 2022

Achromatic is a newer, lower-priced kit with real organizations and roles.
MakerKit adds a track record since 2022, a Supabase edition, hybrid accounts, and an MCP server.
One-time purchase from $349$299, with lifetime updates.
Get MakerKit·$349$299
Claude CodeCursorGemini

MakerKit vs Achromatic: the short answer

Choose MakerKit if you want a kit maintained since 2022 with a dated changelog, a Supabase edition with Row Level Security, personal, team, or hybrid account modes, metered billing, i18n, and AGENTS.md plus an MCP server for coding agents. Choose Achromatic if the lowest price for multi-tenancy matters most and a short public history does not worry you.

We build MakerKit, so weigh this page accordingly. Achromatic pricing was checked on its site in September 2026 and its features in July 2026. Our reservation about Achromatic is evidence of maintenance, not the quality of its code.

Why developers look for an Achromatic alternative

  • Track record. When an agent can write a feature in an afternoon, what you pay for is the maintainer keeping up with Next.js, React, and your auth library for years. Achromatic is newer, with little public history to judge. MakerKit has been maintained since 2022 and publishes a dated changelog.
  • They want Supabase. Achromatic is Prisma and Drizzle only. MakerKit's Supabase kits enforce tenant isolation with Postgres RLS and include Supabase Auth and Storage.
  • Agent tooling for building, not only AI features. The AI SDK scaffolding adds AI features to your product. AGENTS.md files and an MCP server help your coding agent build the product. MakerKit ships both kinds of agent support; Achromatic's docs did not include agent instructions or an MCP server when we checked.
  • Billing and markets beyond Stripe and English. MakerKit adds metered billing, more payment providers, and a fully translatable UI. None of these were documented features of Achromatic when we checked.

MakerKit vs Achromatic: feature comparison

MakerKit features are documented in its public docs. Achromatic features are marked from its public site and docs, checked in July 2026, with pricing checked in September 2026.

Feature comparison of MakerKit and Achromatic
FeatureMakerKitAchromatic
Pricing model
One-time license per developer or team, lifetime updates
One-time, $180, unlimited projects and developers (listed September 2026)
Web frameworks
Next.js, TanStack Start, React Router
Next.js only
Native mobile app
Expo (React Native) kit for iOS and Android
Not offered
Auth and data layer
Supabase Auth + RLS, or Better Auth with Drizzle or Prisma (one kit per license)
Better Auth with Prisma and Drizzle, both in one license
Standalone typed API layer
Server actions and route handlers instead
tRPC
Multi-tenancy (orgs/teams, invites, roles)
Team accounts with invitations and role-based permissions
Organizations with members, invitations, and roles
Account modes (personal/team/hybrid)
Personal-only, team-only, or hybrid via feature flags
Not documented
Seat-based billing
Per-seat plans documented in every kit
Seat-based subscriptions supported
Metered / usage billing
Metered usage; credit-based billing recipe on the Supabase kits
Not documented
Payment providers
Stripe or Lemon Squeezy (Supabase kits); Stripe or Polar (Drizzle, Prisma)
Stripe documented
AGENTS.md, agent rules, MCP server
Agent rules for Claude Code, Cursor, Codex, Gemini, Windsurf; MCP server included
Not in its docs when we checked (September 2026)
Playwright E2E tests
Suite covering auth, billing, and team flows
Playwright tests included
Internationalization (i18n)
Fully translatable UI
Not documented
Docker and Cloudflare deployment
Docker in every Next.js kit; Cloudflare guide on the Supabase kit
Docker-based deployment; Cloudflare not documented
Repository structure
Turborepo monorepo with per-package agent instructions
Single Next.js app
Public maintenance history
Maintained since 2022, dated public changelog
Newer kit, short public history

Legend: green check, documented first-class feature. Yellow minus, partial or limited. Grey circle, not documented when we checked.

Where MakerKit wins, and where Achromatic wins

MakerKit is the better buy if

  • You want to check maintenance before you pay: a dated changelog and public docs covering the current Next.js and React versions.
  • You want Supabase with RLS, or the same architecture on TanStack Start, React Router, or an Expo mobile app.
  • Some customers are individuals and some are companies, and you want hybrid account modes without a redesign.
  • Your pricing includes usage, or you sell outside English-speaking markets.
  • You build with Claude Code, Cursor, or Codex and want AGENTS.md, agent rules, and an MCP server from day one.

Achromatic is the better buy if

  • Price decides it. $180 for organizations and roles is well below MakerKit Pro.
  • Several developers need access and you want one license to cover them all. MakerKit's Developer license is for one person; teams buy a Team license.
  • You like tRPC, or want both ORMs in the repository to compare.
  • You prefer a single Next.js app over a monorepo and do not need Supabase, i18n, or metered billing.

Three trade-offs worth thinking through

Sticker price vs total cost

The license gap is real, and at the $150/hour rate in our SaaS starter kit cost analysis it is roughly an hour of senior developer time. Hybrid account modes, metered billing, or i18n each take longer than that to build if your product ends up needing them.

Two ORMs vs one deep kit

Achromatic includes Prisma and Drizzle in one license. You will ship on one of them. MakerKit licenses one kit per stack, each with its own documentation, and offers a discount if you switch stacks later.

Single app vs Turborepo

A single app is simpler on day one. In MakerKit, kit code lives in packages and your code lives in the app, so pulling upstream updates rarely collides with your changes, and Turborepo caches typechecks and builds per package. Each package also carries its own agent instructions.

What you get with MakerKit

  • The license: a one-time purchase that adds you to the private GitHub repository, with lifetime updates and unlimited products for your own business. See the license terms for Developer and Team licenses.
  • Support: the Discord community, where the maintainer answers kit questions. Team licenses add a private channel.
  • Try before you buy: the documentation is public, so you can read the architecture before paying. Because you receive the full source, refunds are generally not offered once repository access is redeemed; details in the FAQ.

Inside MakerKit

MakerKit team dashboard page in dark mode: the sidebar with the team switcher and navigation, and MRR, revenue, fees and new customer cards above a visitors chart

Products built on MakerKit

See 16 more products from MakerKit customers +

What customers say

Developers and founders on the kits, the docs and the support. Every quote links to the original post.

just wanna say thanks to @gc_psk for building @makerkit_dev . it is such an overpowered template. like finally we have a really good one with active development, good docs and now even cursorrules/windsurfrules to just sit down and see ai agents do the stuff. truly mindblowing.
CRcris@criscounters
Giancarlo Buomprisco

Built and maintained full-time by Giancarlo, a software engineer with almost 15 years of experience at startups and enterprises. Support questions reach me directly.

My favorite so far is @gc_psk and @makerkit_dev ship cursor rules along with updates to the framework. That's been really useful to pull in new version (via git remote) and things stay in sync.
RYRyan Hayeson X
Just started using MakerKit and it's a total game-changer. 🚀 Wish I had this when I was building Phishr. Instant team management and billing? Insane.
HAHarvey Coplestone@hcoplestone
Second that! Giancarlo provides amazing support!! 😄
ANAndrew Willshire@acwillshire
You need to check @makerkit_dev by @gc_psk — it’s the best I’ve seen so far. It’s feature complete, plenty examples, amazing docs, great Discord community, the dude provides support even days after his weeding (which is crazy!) I’m not affiliated in every way, just a happy cx.
IVIvor@madebyivor
Honestly @makerkit_dev is great. More for B2B products but really clean and well documented.
KIKiara Bickers@kiarabickers
Amazing! @gc_psk has built a masterpiece with this one!
ADAditya TripathiClimactic · @AdityaTripathiD
I just stumbled upon @makerkit_dev (and you!), it's impressive, I thought it was a big team behind how many features I saw (and I've been working in software a long time!) I was just looking for a free boilerplate, but the lifetime licence makes it a no brainer. Thank you!
SÉSéraphin Hochart@nsphin
I would have totally agreed with you until… I found @makerkit_dev last year. This is by far, the best boilerplate I found those past years. The dev is pushing new features and updates almost every week. His documentation (specially migrating to Next 15) is the best I’ve seen.
DADavid Dias@TheDavidDias
Makerkit is a gem for makers, if I was not building a desktop app I would be using it for sure, maybe for my next project
KHKhalil NajjarCohere AI · @knajjars
I landed on MakerKit after getting into boilerplates with ShipFast. Much better.
WIWill Mitchell@StartupBros
1000% recommend buying a good boilerplate (or making your own) I use @makerkit_dev it's so good I had an affiliate link, but I can't find it at the moment
DADan Schoonmaker@DanSchoonmaker
For anyone who wants to build their own SaaS, I recommend trying out @makerkit_dev. Thanks to @gc_psk for creating such a fantastic tool that makes building websites a breeze! #SaaS #buildinpublic
CACarl Chan@CarlChan77
We loved the product since when Giancarlo released the first version, and are building upon it ever since for all of our products. Highly recommended for all indie makers out there.
RARade JoksimovicRumora · on X
Solid and battle tested boilerplate with an amazing community and support.
STStefano CantuWiseOptIn · on X
Build vs buy

The rows a cheaper kit leaves you to build

Compare kits on how much of this table they cover and how well they keep covering it after launch. With AI coding tools, that is still 49-81 hours of senior developer time, including fixing the patterns AI got wrong.

Maintained full-time
Since 2022
Kits across 4 frameworks
8
Data layers: Supabase, Drizzle, Prisma
3
Build onceBefore your first feature
Authentication (email, OAuth, MFA)6-10 hours
Stripe subscription billing5-8 hours
Teams, roles & invitations6-10 hours
Super admin dashboard4-6 hours
Transactional emails3-5 hours
Marketing pages2-4 hours
Blog & documentation3-5 hours
Project setup (monorepo, CI, TypeScript)2-3 hours
E2E tests (auth and billing flows)3-5 hours
Maintain foreverAfter launch, for as long as it runs
Refactoring AI-generated patterns15-25 hours
Next.js/React version upgradesEvery major release
Security patches & fixesOngoing, unpredictable
Dependency updatesOngoing

Hours with Claude Code or Cursor · bar shows the range on a 0–25h scale

Building it yourself49-81 hoursWith AI tools, including rework
Developer time saved$7,350-$12,150At $150 an hour
With MakerKitDay 1Every row above ships in the kit, and upgrades keep coming
Get lifetime access

Estimates for a senior developer building from scratch with Claude Code or Cursor at $150/hour, including 15-25 hours refactoring AI-generated patterns. Read the methodology

Choosing MakerKit over Achromatic? Pick your stack

One-time purchase: lifetime license, continuous updates, unlimited projects of your own.

  • Lifetime access to your stack of choice
  • Build unlimited applications
  • Continuous updates
  • Access to the Discord community
  • The best support in the SaaS Starter kits market, period.
  • Community and Chat support
  • Community-based feature requests and Request for Comments. You have a say in what Makerkit should build next.
  • One-time payment, no subscriptions
  • Includes access to our free Figma UI kit

Choose your Stack

Select the technology stack that best fits your project

Pro
A B2B SaaS Starter Kit for individual developers.

$349$299/lifetime

  • Next.js 16, React Router 8, and TanStack Start
  • Supabase-native Stack (Auth, Storage, Database, RLS)
  • Unlimited Projects
  • Continuous updates
  • Lifetime license
  • Access to 1 user (only you)
  • Discord Support
Teams
A B2B SaaS Starter Kit for teams of developers or companies.

$649$599/lifetime

  • Next.js 16, React Router 8, and TanStack Start
  • Supabase-native Stack (Auth, Storage, Database, RLS)
  • Unlimited Projects
  • Continuous updates
  • Lifetime license
  • Up to 5 collaborators
  • Discord Support
  • Private Discord channel

Questions about licensing?

Read the MakerKit license terms and the MakerKit FAQ, or contact me.

Why Achromatic is popular

Achromatic packs a lot into a low price. Its site listed $180 as a one-time payment in September 2026, with lifetime updates and unlimited projects and developers. That makes it the lowest-priced paid multi-tenant kit in our comparison, with organizations, member management, invitations, and roles.

The stack is current: Next.js 16, Better Auth, Prisma or Drizzle (both included in one license), tRPC for the API layer, Tailwind, Shadcn UI, Playwright tests, and AI SDK scaffolding for chatbot features. It ships as a single Next.js app, which is simple to open and read on day one.

Migrating from Achromatic to MakerKit

Both kits run Better Auth with Prisma or Drizzle on Postgres, so auth and data carry over as a mapping exercise. The API layer is where the real work is.

In AchromaticIn MakerKitWhat you rewrite
Better Auth users, OAuth accounts, sessionsBetter Auth in the MakerKit Drizzle and Prisma kitsCompare the generated Better Auth tables and import users and linked OAuth accounts. Sessions end, so users sign in once after the cutover.
Organizations, members, invitationsTeam accounts, memberships, roles, and invitationsMap organization IDs to team accounts and members to memberships, then map roles. Reissue pending invitations.
Prisma or Drizzle schemaThe same ORM in the matching MakerKit kitPort your product tables and scope them to the owning account. Queries move with small changes.
tRPC routers and proceduresServer actions and route handlersThe largest rewrite. Input validation schemas usually carry over; client calls change from tRPC hooks to server actions or fetch.
Stripe plans and webhookMakerKit billing gateway with plans defined in configRecreate plans in the billing config, repoint the webhook, and link existing Stripe customer IDs to accounts.
Single Next.js appapps/web for routes, packages for shared featuresPut your product routes in the app and leave kit packages untouched, so future kit updates merge cleanly.
  1. Keep your ORM: start from the Next.js Drizzle kit or the Next.js Prisma kit. Moving to Supabase for RLS also means moving users to Supabase Auth.
  2. Map organizations to team accounts using the multi-tenant SaaS architecture guide, then port product tables.
  3. Rewrite tRPC procedures as server actions, one feature at a time.
  4. Rehearse the data import on staging, then switch DNS and the Stripe webhook together.
Questions before you buy

Achromatic alternative FAQ

Not covered here? Ask in Discord or contact me. Licensing details are in the MakerKit license terms.

Achromatic is cheaper. Why pay more for MakerKit?

For the maintenance record and the parts Achromatic does not document: a Supabase edition with RLS, hybrid account modes, metered billing, more payment providers, i18n, an MCP server, and TanStack Start, React Router, and mobile kits. If none of those matter and price does, Achromatic is a defensible purchase.

Achromatic includes both Prisma and Drizzle. Is that better value?

Only if you need both. A product ships on one ORM, so what matters is the depth of the kit you build on. MakerKit licenses one kit per stack and discounts a switch if your needs change.

Is a single Next.js app simpler than a monorepo?

On day one, yes. As the product grows, MakerKit's Turborepo layout keeps kit code in packages and your code in the app, so kit updates rarely collide with your work, and builds and typechecks are cached per package.

How does licensing compare for teams and agencies?

Achromatic listed unlimited projects and developers on one license. MakerKit's Developer license covers one person; sharing code with employees or contractors, or building for clients, needs a Team license, and each client receiving source code needs their own license. The client then owns their license, updates, and support.

Is Achromatic maintained?

We have no reason to think otherwise, but it is a newer kit with little public history to judge by. Ask the vendor about release cadence before buying. MakerKit's dated changelog is public.

Spotted something out of date about Achromatic or MakerKit? Please contact us and we will correct it.

Compare other SaaS starter kits

Building for years, not a weekend? Choose MakerKit.

Hybrid accounts, a billing provider abstraction, and a Supabase edition are cheaper to start with than to add later. Get lifetime access and start on the version of your product that lasts.

Check every feature in the docs
Claude CodeCursorGemini